Green Walls Come Under Attack

Sourced from The Fifth Estate

Green wall advocates have hit back at an attack from a leading architect on the value of green walls, citing energy savings and biodiversity benefits.

Green walls have come under fire with the national president of the Australian Institute of Architects, Richard Kirk, questioning their sustainability.

Green walls, or vertical gardens, have taken off in Australia, with many new developments now including them as a key marketing feature.

Mr Kirk, however, told The Australian newspaper on Thursday that they may become eyesores in the future.

“It will be interesting to see how well these green walls will last and stand the test of time,” he said.

While Mr Kirk said internal green walls had functional benefits in terms of air purification and aesthetics, he seemed to question the functional benefits of external “vertical gardens”.

“Certainly, introducing landscaping inside a building has a functional purpose in that it cleans the air and provides a visual relief in internal spaces,” he said.

“But where it’s just placed on the outside of a building, just to conceal a car park, it’s not a responsible use of how to make a city more green.”

The statement has caused upset among green wall advocates, who say there are many benefits to external green walls that have been ignored.

The One Central Park green wall was used to illustrate The Australian’s article, and is the tallest in the world.

Jock Gammon, founder of Junglefy, the company responsible for maintenance of the One Central Park green wall, told The Fifth Estate some comments in the article were “shortsighted” and failed to accurately depict the benefits of the technology.

Green walls, he said, provided a number of benefits aside from aesthetic value, and were key to greening efforts in city areas that did not have space for additional parkland, and where development was increasingly taking up that space.

He said currently unreleased research by Arup found heat load reduction in the order of 35 per cent attributable to the greenery’s cooling effects at One Central Park. Deployed more widely, he said there would be compound benefits due to a reduction in the urban heat island effect.

Increased biodiversity was another important factor. The Central Park green wall was now home to frogs, wasps, bees and even a family of peregrine falcons that “wouldn’t be there if there wasn’t the biodiversity, food sources and plants”.

“The bigger, forward thinking developers are looking beyond pure numbers and giving value to harder to value areas like biophilia and biodiversity,” Mr Gammon said.

Click here to read the full article